$4 Per Gallon Gas = Energy Innovation

Long lines at the gas pump weren’t the only product of the twin energy crises of the 1970s. A legislative push toward energy conservation and innovation were also born as a result.

And that’s why one expert believes the skyrocketing price of oil will do the same in 2011.

“History has proven that innovation in the energy industry has almost always been driven by high consumer prices,” said Robert Brands, a veteran corporate executive who now consults with companies worldwide and author of Robert’s Rules of Innovation. “When we had cheap and abundant oil – and low gas prices – during the 1980s, energy exploration and innovation slowed to a halt. We didn’t need it, and we didn’t see an end in sight to the steady stream of oil from the Middle East. So, investors held back funds for new technologies, oil companies stood pat and conservation became a four-letter word.”

According to the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory for the U.S. Department of Energy, more than $172 billion dollars of government money was spent on new energy technology between 1961 and 2008, with the bulk of it being used during the 1970s. In the 1980s, the spending accounted for only 1 percent of all federal investment.

Brands believes that oil companies, besieged by Congress over taking huge tax breaks amid record profit reports, could earn some much needed political points by taking history’s cue and putting some of that money back into energy innovations.
“When you look at the broad spectrum of what the oil companies are making and compare it to the rate of innovation in alternative energy, it’s like comparing Mount Kilimanjaro to a grape,” Brands said. “Now, most consumers aren’t aware of that truth, because oil companies and ad agencies are very good at making it look like alternative energy is humming along when it’s not. While consumers may not connect those dots, they are very aware of the headlines that show record oil company profits combined with massive tax breaks – especially during a time when federal deficits are threatening them, their children and their children’s children. Today’s energy innovation is a fraction of the total and what should be spend. What’s more, the same old song and dance the oil companies offer with regard to touring how much of a percentage their research and development expenditures are as compared to revenue is a joke, and absolutely no guarantee of success.”

Brands wants oil companies to spark innovation not only because of the positive press it will net, but also because it’s the right thing to do.

“The truth is that many scientists are beginning to calculate an end to the fossil fuel era, because one day, we will run out,” Brands added. “Innovation in this area has been driven by high prices and it has been driven by shortages. When we begin to run out, we’ll experience both, and it will be too late to innovate. We need to do it now, when our resources to commit to it are abundant.”

About Robert Brands

Robert F. Brands, a veteran of companies like GTE, Kohler and Rexam, is president and founder of InnovationCoach.com. Having gained hands-on experience in bringing innovation to market, creating and improving the necessary product development processes and needed culture, he delivered and exceeded bringing “at least one new product per year to market” resulting in double digit profitable growth and shareholder value.

 

Tags: , , , , ,

  • http://www.changeover.com John Henry

    I’ve been interested in alternative energy of all kinds since the 1970s.

    I am not sure that some of the technologies like wind and solar will ever be feasible but there are many other technologies that are and are seldom heard of.

    Landfill gas, cogeneration, OTEC, biogass from cows and more. Also there are many technologies that have the potential to greatly increase oil and gas supplies.

    A recent comment from a Saudi prince confirmed what I have long (20+ years) thought, they are scared of alternative sources of energy. I think but can’t prove, that the oil bust of the 90s was caused by Saudi fear of Colorado shale and Canadian tar sands and a need to drive them out of business.

    We need a $1/gallon tax on gasolene to prevent this happening again.

    John Henry

  • http://www.aboutsmartphone.org Connie Traynham

    Lengthy day to you, I was amazed with your work it’s flawless and phrases are pick perfectly as if it is truly made for the write-up as well as the thoughts on it.

Click on each letter of INNOVATION (below) to explore the imperatives...