<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Roberts Rules of Innovation &#187; risk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertsrulesofinnovation.com/tag/risk/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertsrulesofinnovation.com</link>
	<description>Create and Sustain Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 17:00:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Experimentation + Risk (+ Failure) = Improved Environment for Innovation</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsrulesofinnovation.com/blogs/no-risk-no-innovation-blogs/experimentation-risk-failure-improved-environment-for-innovation-2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertsrulesofinnovation.com/blogs/no-risk-no-innovation-blogs/experimentation-risk-failure-improved-environment-for-innovation-2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NO RISK.. NO INNOVATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high failure rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation coach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert's rules of innovation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsrulesofinnovation.com/?p=430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thomas Alva Edison was a failure. It has been said that he &#8220;went back to the drawing board&#8221; more than 6,000 times before finding the right plant to produce a carbonized filament for his incandescent light bulb.
Six thousand times. Do you have that kind of innovative stamina?

It’s been said that Risk + Experimentation (+ Failure) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas Alva Edison was a failure. It has been said that he &#8220;went back to the drawing board&#8221; more than 6,000 times before finding the right plant to produce a carbonized filament for his incandescent light bulb.</p>
<p>Six thousand times. Do you have that kind of innovative stamina?</p>
<p><span id="more-430"></span></p>
<p>It’s been said that Risk + Experimentation (+ Failure) = Improved Environment for Innovation. Put another way, Innovation = Creativity x Risk Taking.</p>
<p>Innovation is an experiment of sorts. It requires a culture of risk, opportunity and challenge. Moreover, for an organization to benefit from innovation, leaders and team members alike must welcome &#8211; and grow from &#8211; failure.</p>
<p>Rather than view failure as inherently bad, successful innovation requires that executives and teams commit to learning from each experiment gone bad &#8212; and incorporate those teachings into the next endeavor.</p>
<p>The successes and failures borne of innovation experimentation perpetuate innovation.  When strategies are emerging, innovators test their hypotheses and gather information to continue forward with their ideas.  Whether the innovation is a consumer product, a software application, or an internal process for an existing business enterprise or workflow strategy, the question remains: How will the idea resonate with the target audience or user? What costs are reasonable? Can the audience (consumers, manufacturers, employees) be convinced to shift well-established habits to embrace The New?</p>
<p>Because of a high failure rate, organizations pursuing the practice of Innovation must have a tolerance for failure. Not every idea will win. But each failure must be perceived as valuable in the trial-and-error process as a team seeks improvement.  Tolerance for failure must be encouraged, as well as enthusiasm for risk-taking.  Without risk, there can be no reward.</p>
<p>To create a culture of innovation, organizations should:</p>
<p>- Encourage well-reasoned risk-taking. The pursuit of innovation isn&#8217;t some fool-hardy flight of fancy. Encourage &#8212; or insist upon &#8212; a plan to be presented first, to ensure understanding and buy-in across the affected organization. Know your tolerance for risk and failure in the pursuit of innovation.</p>
<p>- Test. True innovation requires thorough testing in pursuit of success. Testing, measurement, and an accounting of what&#8217;s been learned &#8212; even in failure &#8212; brings measurable outcomes from successes and failures alike.</p>
<p>- Trust. Do you &#8211; as a CEO or team leader &#8211; trust your people to pursue new ideas on behalf of the company? Build a culture of trust in the individual&#8217;s pursuits &#8212; so long as safety-measures are in place to safe guard against failure damaging the organization.</p>
<p>Most of all, avoid letting a failed concept kill your team&#8217;s motivation.  Every idea should be given positive acknowledgment, every failure should be studied for &#8220;what went wrong,&#8221; and every success should receive appropriate reward.  By providing your team with a culture of Innovation, their risk-taking abilities will improve. And, as was the case with Mr. Edison, they eventually will see the light borne from their successful innovations.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gZTVX21jPtc&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x234900&amp;color2=0x4e9e00" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gZTVX21jPtc&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x234900&amp;color2=0x4e9e00" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertsrulesofinnovation.com/blogs/no-risk-no-innovation-blogs/experimentation-risk-failure-improved-environment-for-innovation-2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Innovation: Training &amp; Coaching, Business Overlooked Imperative</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsrulesofinnovation.com/blogs/training-coaching-blogs/innovation-training-coaching-business-overlooked-imperative.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertsrulesofinnovation.com/blogs/training-coaching-blogs/innovation-training-coaching-business-overlooked-imperative.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TRAINING & COACHING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new product development team]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsrulesofinnovation.com/?p=320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smart companies often pride themselves on training programs that introduce or enhance employees’ knowledge of corporate business practices. They promote mentoring initiatives that pair seasoned execs with rising talent. They create booklets or PDFs on corporate policy – and implore staff to read them.

But introduce a business innovation initiative, and those involved are expected to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smart companies often pride themselves on training programs that introduce or enhance employees’ knowledge of corporate business practices. They promote mentoring initiatives that pair seasoned execs with rising talent. They create booklets or PDFs on corporate policy – and implore staff to read them.</p>
<p><span id="more-320"></span></p>
<p>But introduce a business innovation initiative, and those involved are expected to just know how things are done. They’re supposed to possess some innate awareness of the concepts, the best practices, the goals, milestones and targeted end-game.</p>
<p>It doesn’t work that way.</p>
<p>Innovation is a learned concept. Training and coaching is the forgotten imperative in the process of innovation. For best practices in the pursuit of innovation have to be shared to be learned – and mastered.</p>
<p>From the Chief Innovation Officer (CIO) to the innovation team to rank-and-file employees who will implement, follow through or carry forth on the fruits of innovation, people don’t just know. They’re taught.</p>
<p>Organizations whose teams are not trained and coached in its unique approach to the imperatives of innovation are destined to amass a litany of failed projects.</p>
<p>For example, a major multinational launched a new Innovation initiative with the hopes of turn-around renewed profitability and growth. After much initial excitement and visibility, expected results did not materialize – and in the turn-around world, false starts are more costly for an organization than starts or restarts.</p>
<p>What happened? The team involved basic project management training. After a course of such training and coaching, associates had gained a common language and understanding. Progress was realized, and the company today remains on a growth path.</p>
<p>Training and coaching is vital to transmitting the organization’s unique approach to innovation – and ensuring people adhere to its practices. Proper hiring, training and coaching is the way to create, reinforce and enhance company culture and mindset. At its root, training and coaching introduces people to the organization’s vision, mission, strategy and objectives, and points everyone’s compass toward True North.</p>
<p>Training and coaching should cover the lot – from the unique way ideation is treated, to the unique way ideas are cataloged and approached; teams are inspired, formed and managed; risk is assessed; new product development is explored; ownership is encouraged; value is created; accountability is attached; metrics are observed and measured; net results are rewarded; and yes, how teams are trained and coached.</p>
<p>Training and coaching is developed and delivered on a continuum. No sooner are existing policies and best practices discussed, then new procedures are introduced to further the organization’s pursuit of innovation.</p>
<p>Continuity is the key. Training helps your team constantly improve its skill set, through new techniques in ideation, process experience and intra-organizational communication of best practices. Ongoing reinforcement helps employees understand their place and aspire to greatness on the New Product Development team (whether that “product” is a product, a service or an internal practice).</p>
<p>This goes beyond the team. Trainers and coaches need continuous training and coaching, as well. Even the CIO at times requires training and coaching on evolving corporate innovation practices.</p>
<p>Alas, training and coaching often is lost or last as companies often believe they have little time and money to fund these efforts. Best of breed companies have earmarked a dedicated budget to training and coaching.</p>
<p>Why? Because they realize the downside of not training – and retraining – their people in the process of innovation is to be mired in mediocrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertsrulesofinnovation.com/blogs/training-coaching-blogs/innovation-training-coaching-business-overlooked-imperative.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is Your Risk Appetite?</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsrulesofinnovation.com/blogs/no-risk-no-innovation-blogs/what-is-your-risk-appetite.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertsrulesofinnovation.com/blogs/no-risk-no-innovation-blogs/what-is-your-risk-appetite.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NO RISK.. NO INNOVATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation in companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk taking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsrulesofinnovation.com/?p=303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well-considered risk taking is critical, not just for the success of individual companies but also to enable a properly functioning economy. Companies that are too cautious for too long sometimes discover that they’ve made a significant mistake. To avoid swinging between excessive caution and over-exuberance, set a disciplined target for your desired investment outcomes.

Whether Financial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well-considered risk taking is critical, not just for the success of individual companies but also to enable a properly functioning economy. Companies that are too cautious for too long sometimes discover that they’ve made a significant mistake. To avoid swinging between excessive caution and over-exuberance, set a disciplined target for your desired investment outcomes.</p>
<p><span id="more-303"></span></p>
<p>Whether Financial or Innovation applies to both/all, see: <a href="http://www.strategy-business.com/article/00010?gko=b6470-27802017-29206682&amp;cid=enews20091201">http://www.strategy-business.com/article/00010?gko=b6470-27802017-29206682&amp;cid=enews20091201</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertsrulesofinnovation.com/blogs/no-risk-no-innovation-blogs/what-is-your-risk-appetite.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Experimentation + Risk (+ Failure) = Improved Environment for Innovation</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsrulesofinnovation.com/blogs/no-risk-no-innovation-blogs/experimentation-risk-failure-improved-environment-for-innovation.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertsrulesofinnovation.com/blogs/no-risk-no-innovation-blogs/experimentation-risk-failure-improved-environment-for-innovation.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NO RISK.. NO INNOVATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high failure rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation coach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert's rules of innovation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsrulesofinnovation.com/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thomas Alva Edison was a failure. It has been said that he &#8220;went back to the drawing board&#8221; more than 6,000 times before finding the right plant to produce a carbonized filament for his incandescent light bulb.
Six thousand times. Do you have that kind of innovative stamina?

It’s been said that Risk + Experimentation (+ Failure) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas Alva Edison was a failure. It has been said that he &#8220;went back to the drawing board&#8221; more than 6,000 times before finding the right plant to produce a carbonized filament for his incandescent light bulb.</p>
<p>Six thousand times. Do you have that kind of innovative stamina?<br />
<span id="more-213"></span><br />
It’s been said that Risk + Experimentation (+ Failure) = Improved Environment for Innovation. Put another way, Innovation = Creativity x Risk Taking.</p>
<p>Innovation is an experiment of sorts. It requires a culture of risk, opportunity and challenge. Moreover, for an organization to benefit from innovation, leaders and team members alike must welcome &#8211; and grow from &#8211; failure.</p>
<p>Rather than view failure as inherently bad, successful innovation requires that executives and teams commit to learning from each experiment gone bad &#8212; and incorporate those teachings into the next endeavor.</p>
<p>The successes and failures borne of innovation experimentation perpetuate innovation. When strategies are emerging, innovators test their hypotheses and gather information to continue forward with their ideas. Whether the innovation is a consumer product, a software application, or an internal process for an existing business enterprise or workflow strategy, the question remains: How will the idea resonate with the target audience or user? What costs are reasonable? Can the audience (consumers, manufacturers, employees) be convinced to shift well-established habits to embrace The New?</p>
<p>Because of a high failure rate, organizations pursuing the practice of Innovation must have a tolerance for failure. Not every idea will win. But each failure must be perceived as valuable in the trial-and-error process as a team seeks improvement. Tolerance for failure must be encouraged, as well as enthusiasm for risk-taking. Without risk, there can be no reward.</p>
<p>To create a culture of innovation, organizations should:</p>
<p>- Encourage well-reasoned risk-taking. The pursuit of innovation isn&#8217;t some fool-hardy flight of fancy. Encourage &#8212; or insist upon &#8212; a plan to be presented first, to ensure understanding and buy-in across the affected organization. Know your tolerance for risk and failure in the pursuit of innovation.</p>
<p>- Test. True innovation requires thorough testing in pursuit of success. Testing, measurement, and an accounting of what&#8217;s been learned &#8212; even in failure &#8212; brings measurable outcomes from successes and failures alike.</p>
<p>- Trust. Do you &#8211; as a CEO or team leader &#8211; trust your people to pursue new ideas on behalf of the company? Build a culture of trust in the individual&#8217;s pursuits &#8212; so long as safety-measures are in place to safe guard against failure damaging the organization.</p>
<p>Most of all, avoid letting a failed concept kill your team&#8217;s motivation. Every idea should be given positive acknowledgment, every failure should be studied for &#8220;what went wrong,&#8221; and every success should receive appropriate reward. By providing your team with a culture of Innovation, their risk-taking abilities will improve. And, as was the case with Mr. Edison, they eventually will see the light borne from their successful innovations.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gZTVX21jPtc&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x234900&amp;color2=0x4e9e00" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gZTVX21jPtc&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x234900&amp;color2=0x4e9e00" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertsrulesofinnovation.com/blogs/no-risk-no-innovation-blogs/experimentation-risk-failure-improved-environment-for-innovation.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
