Posts Tagged ‘Robert Brands’

Walking on the Edge with Innovation

Monday, May 6th, 2013

Innovation thrives on a diet of news ideas. It needs new views, fresh thinking; a different perspective from across the organization, from the center to the edge.

Walking on the edge

According to John Hagel and John Seely Brown for the Aspen Institute Roundtable Discussion in 2012, the place where innovation is most likely to flourish is not at the core of an organization but at the edge “where the weight of inertia is less inhibiting and where disruptive initiatives are more likely to be tolerated”.  Edges are described as peripheral areas where growth has the highest potential. They can also be the riskiest.

By contrast, the “core” of an organization or market is where the money and resources are located. The core is also the most resistant to change. The core makes up the central or essential part of a company, market, or industry.

In order to sustain innovation, risks must be undertaken. No Risk: No Innovation.  Put another way, No guts, no glory. Without risk, there can be no Innovation. Entire industries were made possible only by the risks taken in developing and commercializing them; from the 19th century advances in railroads and steam engines all the way to the invention of electricity and the later development of light bulbs, televisions, computers, internet, biotechnology, and more.

According to another article by Mr. Hagel and Mr. Brown for the HBR network, “unmet needs and unexploited capabilities tend to surface first on the edge.” In order to best take advantage of this tendency, they suggest bringing the core to the edge by exposing your company to “institutional innovations and new management practices” that emerge on the edge.

In order to foster initiative and innovation, ask yourself these questions.

  • Do you allow free research and development (R&D) time?
  • Do you invest in innovation: money, people, and resources?
  • Do you celebrate failure and risk taking?
  • Are you willing to bring the core of your business to the edge?

Although being on the edge can be risky, it is well worth it. Personal laptops were once on the edge of the traditional computer industry. Mobile banking at one time was considered the “edge”.  Hagel and Seely point out that even the iPod emerged on the edge of a number of industries, including consumer electronics, music, and the Internet.

 

To create a culture of innovation and risk taking, organizations should:

Encourage well-reasoned risk taking. Let your people feel safe to fail, but empower them to do their best work. Encourage or insist upon a plan to be presented first, to ensure understanding and buy-in across the affected organization. Know your tolerance for risk and failure in the pursuit of innovation. The key however, is to make failure a “learning experience

Test. True innovation requires thorough testing in pursuit of success. Testing, measurement, and an accounting of what’s been learned, even in failure, bring measurable outcomes from successes and failures alike.

Trust. Trust your people to pursue new ideas on behalf of your company. Build a culture of trust in individual’s pursuits but ensure safety measures are in place to safe guard against failure damaging the organization.

Five Questions to Ask Before Mapping Out an Innovation Plan

Wednesday, May 9th, 2012
By focusing effort in the right places, companies can avoid oversight and increase their chances of innovation success.

By focusing effort in the right places, companies can avoid oversight and increase their chances of innovation success.

There are plenty of reasons to innovate.

Especially now more than ever before, sustained innovation is the means to developing marketplace showstoppers that lead to profitable growth.

Innovation is not a luxury that can be placed on the back burner, even for today’s successful companies.

So before beginning your next innovation effort, here are some key questions to consider for mapping out an effective innovation plan.

1. What type of innovation does your organization need?

The key to implementing innovation is first defining the type that your organization needs. The hardest kind of innovation to manage is breakthrough — which creates an entirely new way to deliver value. Few and far between, these game changers hold the greatest potential for business success.

Most innovations are incremental, which can mean a tweak on an existing product, process or service. Examining how your innovation effort fits into the current organization’s needs is critical at this go/no-go checkpoint.

(There is nothing wrong with focusing and starting with incremental innovation or line extensions to get some early wins, get the organization engaged and excited and create a structured, repeatable process.)

See full article at: http://www.industryweek.com/articles/five_questions_to_ask_before_mapping_out_an_innovation_plan_27300.aspx?Page=2&SectionID=4?ShowAll=1

Tax Innovation: The Path to Long-Term Prosperity

Wednesday, May 2nd, 2012

By Robert Brands and Martin Kleinman

We Americans need to wake up – now – and stop acting like spoiled, immature children.  Elected officials need to put aside partisanship – now – and do what’s in the best interest of our country and speak the truth to the electorate.  And we all must do this without fostering and perpetuating certain convenient misconceptions and without coddling us like soft, over-indulgent parents afraid to say “no.”

We are in an economic fix of epic proportions, one that a short-term approach, will not cure.  Innovation in the halls of industry drives long-term success and, similarly, it will take sustainable innovation by government – and by all citizens – to pull us out of the hole we are in.  As we’ve learned in our business lives, these days, you innovate, or you die.

What Happened?

It took some doing to get in the fix we’re in.  It’s a familiar litany: housing bubble that decimated personal wealth and reduced local revenues, personal credit cards maxed out, two 10-year + wars run off the books, a Wall Street meltdown that torpedoed retirement accounts and personal wealth, frozen capital markets frozen.  Consumers cut spending and companies cling to cash, with hiring and capital expenditures on “perma-hold.”

Meantime, cuts in Federal spending shifted the onus for needed programs to the States and local municipalities.  Accelerating global demand for petroleum, from new economic powerhouses such as China and India, helped drive up prices (along with pressures from market speculation), further constricting the U.S. consumer spending on other goods and services that helps drives economic growth, here and abroad.

On the revenue side of the ledger, “temporary” and unfunded Bush tax cuts (made semi-permanent) threw our huge budget surplus into the wood chipper.  Add the pressure of reduced revenues from current income tax rates, the lowest in six decades, and you begin to see why we face a gaping chasm of a deficit and a fragile economy that is so slow to recover.

The Result?

Millions of Americans – our friends, neighbors and families — are unemployed or underemployed.  Too many have simply given up and are out of the workforce altogether.  And the answers show no creativity, only a startling lack of decency and compassion for those less fortunate that this country was built upon.  Such solutions denigrate our sense of national pride and tread upon the Golden Rule we all hold to.

What’s the Answer?

The solution of all too many in Congress is to balance the budget solely through “elimination of bloat.” Eviscerate government programs that protect the most vulnerable of us, slash “entitlements” — cuts, cuts and more cuts (but keep your hands off the Pentagon budget), they say.

But raising revenues?  Here is where today’s new breed of fiscally conservative ideologues dig in their heels.  No tax increases, period, they say.  To our way of thinking, that is an approach that is more than uncompassionate.  Tactically speaking, it won’t work.  It’s simply not nearly enough to take the machete to human resource programs and, frankly, it’s not the approach that our nation needs or deserves, philosophically, morally or fiscally.

We need to think as innovators.  This needs to be a major effort, an economic Apollo Program.  We need to reward and encourage innovative ways of attacking our problem, rather than clinging to past failed policies.

Yes, of course: we need to surgically, compassionately and intelligently reduce costs.

Simultaneously, we need to increase revenues as we surgically cut expenses.  Let’s close tax  loop holes, let the Bush tax cuts expire for higher net worth earners and creating a fairer, progressive tax code.

Raising taxes is not without precedent.  Many of our most well-respected leaders raised taxes in response to, and in anticipation of, fluid economic scenarios.  Fact: Ronald Reagan raised taxes nearly every year he was in office, 11 times in all.

As we all know, when managing one’s household budget, both a sharp pencil for unnecessary costs and a path forward to maximize revenue are necessary, in order to succeed.  We strive to keep expenses in check and optimize salaries.  And each of these elements requires creativity and innovation in order to be successful.

Innovation drives success and must be fostered, in the boardroom and in our government’s halls of power.  The need for sustainable innovation was the mantra in our recent book.

Experience shows that innovation is an imperative in today’s world.  In business, you innovate, or you die.  Yet, in today’s business climate, one of the first budget line items to be cut – in a misguided attempt to achieve “addition by subtraction” – is Research and Development and New Product Development.  Innovation is the very last thing managers should eliminate during rough economic conditions.

By extension, cutting education budgets and constricting access to higher education, is – to our way of thinking – the same as curtailing R&D expenses in business.   It’s a false savings.  Innovation and education are powerful investments in the future.

Our leaders should be doing all they can to bolster education.  We need to encourage our best and brightest to become educators.  These educators, in turn, must enhance the learning process to leverage the latest technology and captivate the power of our young minds.  Our elected leaders need to widen the pathway to needed higher education, including specialized technical and vocational programming.  That’s the way to foster the innovative thinking we will need to best the international competition that, at this point, is far outpacing our youngsters in terms of knowledge and critical thinking skills.

The Misconceptions

To our point made in our opening statement, there are certain misconceptions that some find it politically expedient to promote and protect.

Please note: “Tax” is not a dirty word.  The Constitution of the United States grants Congress the “Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States…”

“Entitlement” is not a dirty word either.  Medicare and Social Security, as two examples, are commonly referred to as “entitlements.”   They are, in fact, paid for over a lifetime of earning and are not “hand outs” or welfare, as the word “entitlement” might imply.

We have one last popular misconception to debunk, about oil.  Here’s the reality: the U.S. cannot drill its way out of higher gas prices.  Even with falling domestic consumption, U.S. crude oil consumption far outpaces home production.  Further, home production is sold on the world market, not captured for proprietary, domestic use and prices are set globally.

Conclusions

As the 2012 Presidential election looms, we call on all Americans, from every part of the country and from every political persuasion, to work together to understand the magnitude of our economic situation, the ramifications of not taking responsible action and of not sharing sacrifice.  Further, we need to stop perpetuating certain the popular misconceptions that blur our thinking.

Efforts to correct our past errors must include both budget refinement and revenue increases, as every head of household knows.  Shared sacrifice along with compassion for the least fortunate among us should be our watchwords.  Our country has and will continue to be driven by innovation.  And the innovators of the future, our children, must be spared from draconian cuts to education and training needed to ensure their success in a global economic playing field.

Finally, we must act without rancor and with maturity and intelligence.  We must learn to face facts squarely and address and dismiss common misconceptions.  There is an all too pervasive cultural mythology that demonizes the most vulnerable in our society and discredits, or dismisses out of hand, the economic tactics needed to get us back on course.

For, make no mistake: we are in this together.  And so we must share in the sacrifices ahead, proportionate to our financial abilities.  Together, we can get back on track.  Divided, we fear an economic, political and social cataclysm that will make the hardships of the last five years pale in comparison.

###

Robert Brands, with Martin Kleinman, authored Robert’s Rules of Innovation (Wiley & Sons).  Brands is President and Founder of Brands & Company, LLC. and InnovationCoach.com.  His hands-on experience in bringing innovation to market spans decades, and includes the creation and improvement of product development processes and company culture. Kleinman is Managing Director of Communications Strategies, LLC, the NY-based marketing communications firm.

Three Issues that Stifle Innovation, and How to Overcome Them

Tuesday, March 6th, 2012

innovation1As an innovation leader, you know how important a culture of sustained innovation is to the survival of your organization. However, there are many factors that can challenge the innovation process. These issues may come from team members, executives, or the general culture of the organization. Here some common challenges that companies deal with, and solutions for overcoming them.

1. The culture of the company is to keep doing things the way they’ve been done in the past – there is a lack of curiosity and eagerness to change.

If this sounds like your organization, you know that lack of inspiration can be a frustrating situation. Determining a vision for the future of the company is the first step to tackling this problem. Set quantitative goals, such as bringing one new product per year to market, and decide the people, facilities, and resources you will need to achieve those goals. The new product development (NPD) process consists of a clear action plan, with regular meetings to instill accountability. Making NPD meetings mandatory, and monitoring progress, is the only way to ensure productivity and that the plan will stay on track.

2. Innovation attempts in the past have failed, causing team members to be hesitant about taking risks.

This is certainly a common problem in organizations, as the success ratio for new products is actually very low. A study on the grocery business (allbusiness.com) pegged the success rate for new product entries at just 1%. Without risk, there can be no innovation, so it is important for the innovation leader to invite all ideas from all sectors of the organization. Encourage risk-taking and manage failure as a learning experience, as it is an inevitable part of the innovation process. Communicate with team members to establish trust that failures will not result in punitive measures.

3. Ideation sessions lack creativity, as team members have their “day jobs” to attend to.

With routine responsibilities of the daily workplace, innovation can easily be put on the backburner. Choosing a diverse group for ideation sessions can provide just the right amount of social tension needed for a quality outcome. Break up teams and select people who do not often work together in order to minimize group think. Vary the format of meetings to avoid predictable times and places – perhaps hold a meeting at a customer’s office to take people out of their comfort zone. Creating new environments for a diverse group will garner fresh perspective.

These scenarios and solutions were based on the ten imperatives by Robert Brands to create and sustain “New” in business. For more tips on successfully achieving innovation, see “Robert’s Rules of Innovation: A 10-Step Program for Corporate Survival.”

Small Biz Radio Host Jim Blasingame with Robert Brands

Wednesday, February 29th, 2012

Robert Brands joins Jim Blasingame on the Small Business Advocate radio show to discuss how to inspire Innovation.

As the life cycles of innovations get shorter and shorter each year, it is truly an “innovate or die” world for businesses everywhere. Consumer expectations drive the need to innovate, and Robert Brands shares the best practices for bringing about that change in an organization.

Innovation is all about passion, and is not for the faint of heart. As an innovation leader, you have to walk the walk and talk to talk to truly inspire change. To achieve a culture of innovation, the leader must convince the organization that innovation is everybody’s responsibility. Customer needs can come all levels of the company – not just senior executives but employees in sales, finance, customer service, marketing, and more. Robert Brands talks about including all employees in ideation and creation of innovations.

The ten imperatives of Robert’s Rules of Innovation offer a structured, repeatable process for companies to reach their goals such as bringing one new product to market per year. The key is to commit to innovation. This means tolerating all innovation endeavors, including some failures along the way. Robert Brands encourages risk-taking, failure management, and rewarding leadership as part of a holistic approach to bringing about innovation.

From inspiration to training and coaching, listen to the ten imperatives here in Jim Blasingame’s interview with Robert Brands on the Small Business Advocate show:







For more tips on sustaining innovation, see “Robert’s Rules of Innovation: A 10-Step Program for Corporate Survival” or visit InnovationCoach.com.

Managing the Uncertainty of Open Innovation

Tuesday, February 21st, 2012

open-innovationOne of the hottest topics in business management today is open innovation. The concept uses an open business model for companies to “co-innovate” with their partners, suppliers, and customers – in order to accelerate the rewards of innovation. For example, a small or midsized company develops a game-changing new idea and works with a larger company to bring the product to market.

Through the collaborative relationship of open innovation, companies are able to leverage new ideas and products, and conduct experiments at lower risk levels. However, open innovation does bring up some concerns, like who owns rights to the intellectual property (IP). Open innovation should be conducted in a manner that promotes mutual trust and respect. It can be a double-edged sword when the larger company insists on owning the IP in exchange for their investment. The open innovation relationship can be a tricky one to navigate.

Large corporations like Nestle, Kraft, Siemens, General Mills, and Clorox all participate in open innovation practices. Here is a case study of the open innovation process at Proctor & Gamble, one of the most respected consumer product companies in the world. P&G introduced their Connect + Develop program on their website at www.pgconnectdevelop.com. The site is a place where the general public can submit their innovations, read about successful business partnerships, and even scavenge current IP needs of the company.

“Historically, P&G relied on internal capabilities… We did not actively seek to connect with potential external partners. Times have changed, and the world is more connected. In the areas in which we do business, there are millions of scientists, engineers and other companies globally. Why not collaborate with them? We now embrace open innovation…” reads the P&G website. In just over two years, the program has received 7,500 submissions. P&G has established more than 1,000 active agreements with innovation partners, and claims more than 50% of their product initiatives involved collaboration from outside innovators.

In the Connect + Develop program, innovators must have their IP in place before they submit their idea. This protects the innovator while the IP adds value to the organization – the key is to build relationships and produce win-win deals. Through working together and developing effective ways to manage IP rights, open innovation can further advance innovative culture and produce favorable results for all parties involved.

Here are some tips for nurturing open innovation in your business.

  • It takes leverage, courage, and toughness to create a balanced open innovation relationship. In a balanced relationship, the IP or technology of the inventors or small business should remain theirs.
  • Develop both reactive and proactive ways to address open innovation. On the reactive side, invite the world’s finest innovators seeking open innovation opportunities to develop your IP needs.
  • Proactively, tap into local universities, companies, and venture capital firms to meet inventors, set up networks, and make connections that are not readily apparent to most people.

For more tips, see “Robert’s Rules of Innovation : A 10-Step Program for Corporate Survival” by Robert Brands with Martin Kleinman.

Audio Book Release of “Robert’s Rules of Innovation”

Monday, January 23rd, 2012

cd-nowavailable“Robert’s Rules of Innovation: A 10-Step Program for Corporate Survival” by Innovation guru Robert Brands is now available as an audio book in a 4 CD set or downloadable at https://www.cdtdigital.com/rroi/index.php

In his book Robert Brands provides a step-by-step guide to implementing and sustaining Innovation in the workplace. His ideas are distilled from over 25 years of hands-on experience as an Innovation leader. Brands has successfully delivered on his goal of bringing “at least one new product per year to market,” resulting in double-digit profitable growth and shareholder value.

The Ten Imperatives in Robert’s Rules of Innovation are easy to implement steps coupled with real life examples and best practices for starting, nurturing, and profiting from a culture of Innovation.

“Due to requests from CEOs and executives, we created this valuable guide to create and sustain innovation available in an easy format,” says Robert Brands, “No matter the size of your organization or the industry you’re in, Innovation is essential to survival – so managers at all levels can benefit from these practical steps.”

For more information on the audio book and a preview, please visit: https://www.cdtdigital.com/rroi/index.php

 

ABOUT BRANDS & COMPANY, LLC.

Brands & Company, LLC is an Innovation management-consulting firm. The firm, founded by Robert F. Brands, focuses on creating and sustaining innovation in business. Operating as “Innovation Coach,” Brands is promoting a “Sustained Innovation Commitment” to deliver profitable growth, for more details visit www.innovationcoach.com.

Brands has over 25 years of hands-on experience in creating and teaching innovation, having worked in new product development and marketing at Philips Lighting, Sylvania and the Kohler Company. Most recently, he served as Managing Director of the Personal Care Division of Rexam Plastics. Prior to Rexam and since 1998, Brands built (Rexam) Airspray N.V., now a worldwide leader in the design, manufacture and supply of innovative non-aerosol foam technology like instant foaming hand soap.

Should You Reward Bad Ideas?

Tuesday, September 6th, 2011

Some ideas are crazy. Some are underdeveloped. Some will fail. How can you deal with them without squelching your employees’ creativity?

True or false: There’s no such thing as a bad idea.

Of course bad ideas exist. In retrospect, the AOL-Time Warner merger was not the wisest idea. Neither is photocopying your face. But ask any number of innovation experts and they’ll all give you a different answer. Of course there is such thing as a bad idea. Or:Every idea has its merit. Or: It depends…

Within the context of innovation, how to handle bad ideas is a controversial topic because statistically speaking, most ideas are bad. Ninety-three percent of successful innovations start in the wrong direction and countless more never succeed. “In entrepreneurship, most ideas fail,” explains Roy RosinIntuit‘s vice president of innovation. “You either scale the wrong thing or you scale in the wrong direction. And it’s hard to predict.”

With no handy algorithm to identify good ideas, innovative companies have to accept that with every great, useful, idea, there will be many more that fall away. Unused ideas are frequently off-topic, underdeveloped, or poorly timed; however, this doesn’t make them bad. So should you reject these wayward ideas, or should you reward them?

Taken literally, rewarding bad ideas sounds preposterous. In competitive climates, separating the best from the rest motivates future growth. But most entrepreneurs would agree that to foster creativity and collaboration, every voice should be listened to and every idea should be shared. If every unused idea is treated like a bad idea, don’t we run the risk of discouraging future innovation? The following six arguments for and against rewarding so-called bad ideas will help you decide what is best for your company.

Should You Reward Bad Ideas? Yes, Reward Unappealing Ideas.

Chances are, you won’t like every idea brought to the table. But hold your judgment. Successful brainstorms incorporate a diverse group of people collaborating with one another and contributing as much as possible without any arguments, debates or snap decisions on their merit.

“The worst thing you can do as a leader is to be the single determining factor of whether an idea is good or bad,” says innovation coach Robert Brands. ”If they’re good, they become the boss’s idea and if they’re bad, you lose ownership of the operation.”

Instead, Brands suggests a method where everyone (“From the maintenance man to the CEO,” he says. “Everyone!”) develop the parameters new ideas should be measured against. Common parameters include profitability, patent potential, customers service, global impact. And, if an idea doesn’t fit your parameters but your employees are passionate about it, consider rewarding their enthusiasm instead.

Read the complete article on Inc.com:

http://www.inc.com/guides/201108/how-to-reward-bad-ideas.html

$4 Per Gallon Gas = Energy Innovation

Tuesday, June 7th, 2011

Long lines at the gas pump weren’t the only product of the twin energy crises of the 1970s. A legislative push toward energy conservation and innovation were also born as a result.

And that’s why one expert believes the skyrocketing price of oil will do the same in 2011.

“History has proven that innovation in the energy industry has almost always been driven by high consumer prices,” said Robert Brands, a veteran corporate executive who now consults with companies worldwide and author of Robert’s Rules of Innovation. “When we had cheap and abundant oil – and low gas prices – during the 1980s, energy exploration and innovation slowed to a halt. We didn’t need it, and we didn’t see an end in sight to the steady stream of oil from the Middle East. So, investors held back funds for new technologies, oil companies stood pat and conservation became a four-letter word.”

According to the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory for the U.S. Department of Energy, more than $172 billion dollars of government money was spent on new energy technology between 1961 and 2008, with the bulk of it being used during the 1970s. In the 1980s, the spending accounted for only 1 percent of all federal investment.

Brands believes that oil companies, besieged by Congress over taking huge tax breaks amid record profit reports, could earn some much needed political points by taking history’s cue and putting some of that money back into energy innovations.
“When you look at the broad spectrum of what the oil companies are making and compare it to the rate of innovation in alternative energy, it’s like comparing Mount Kilimanjaro to a grape,” Brands said. “Now, most consumers aren’t aware of that truth, because oil companies and ad agencies are very good at making it look like alternative energy is humming along when it’s not. While consumers may not connect those dots, they are very aware of the headlines that show record oil company profits combined with massive tax breaks – especially during a time when federal deficits are threatening them, their children and their children’s children. Today’s energy innovation is a fraction of the total and what should be spend. What’s more, the same old song and dance the oil companies offer with regard to touring how much of a percentage their research and development expenditures are as compared to revenue is a joke, and absolutely no guarantee of success.”

Brands wants oil companies to spark innovation not only because of the positive press it will net, but also because it’s the right thing to do.

“The truth is that many scientists are beginning to calculate an end to the fossil fuel era, because one day, we will run out,” Brands added. “Innovation in this area has been driven by high prices and it has been driven by shortages. When we begin to run out, we’ll experience both, and it will be too late to innovate. We need to do it now, when our resources to commit to it are abundant.”

About Robert Brands

Robert F. Brands, a veteran of companies like GTE, Kohler and Rexam, is president and founder of InnovationCoach.com. Having gained hands-on experience in bringing innovation to market, creating and improving the necessary product development processes and needed culture, he delivered and exceeded bringing “at least one new product per year to market” resulting in double digit profitable growth and shareholder value.

 

Innovation Resolution 2011

Monday, January 3rd, 2011

Welcome to the New Year! As a business leader, what are your
New Year’s resolutions for your company? As you think about the future of your
company and how to make your business grow, implementing sustainable Innovation
should be your top priority for 2011. Innovation is the lifeblood of any
company and the only way to stay ahead of the competition.

Let’s take a look back at the 2010 Brand Innovations:  http://popsop.com/41746

For example, after over 30 years in business, Apple
continues to deliver a steady stream of new and refreshed products year after
year. It’s easy to see why competitors have to be on top of their game to
compete with Apple in the consumer electronics market. It’s Innovate or Perish.

Innovation is key in delivering profitable growth. If you
are looking to get started, look for Robert’s Rules of Innovation,
the imperatives for how to create and sustain Innovation. Don’t get left behind
in the New Year; make sure your company has the roadmap to successful
innovation implementation.

A Prosperous and Innovative 2011 to you and yours.